Aug 24th 1972, was day when first ODI Century was scored by D L Amiss exactly 35 years later Sachin missed his ton. It’s a day Sachin (rather his fans) would like to forget, Dravid and
Harsha Bhogle once in his commentary had mentioned about "Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory"; it’s so true with this INDIAN team. These games are like one of those street fights where a "star player" intentionally takes the beating for a period of time and pretends to be down and under until the betting ratio increases and finally when instructions come in he over powers the opponent. I don't see any difference the way
Couple of hrs later 30 ball 60 runs required and 7 wickets down situation and Sri Sri Sri comes to bowl, ideal situation for him to display his talent. On a given day he can play for either team, such is his talent, he tried his best. Last over 30 runs required and munaf just gave 20. Probably Dravid knows his bowlers’ well that explains his 63 ball 92 knock.
It’s tough to believe it’s the same Dravid who scored 12 (96 ball) in the 3rd Test.
I sometimes believe that Dravid has schizophrenia, or split personality as it’s commonly called. More “filmy” its Vikram's Anniyan(tamil) or Aparachitidu (telgu) or Devgan's Deewangee. Thats my perspective (which only brings humor), in CRICKET world its called class or playing according to the condition. But the 12 (96) innings was a PITA (Pain In The Ass) innings. I was like adding salt (rather chili powder) on ENG's newly wounds. My friend Mandar mentioned that police rather than using 3rd degree on prisoners (to confess or extract some information) they should repeatedly show the Dravid's PITA innings.
But I liked Dravid's focus (series win imp 1-0 or 2-0 doesn't really matter) simple and effective strategy. More time the INDIANS play, less time the ENG will get to play, which would lead to a draw and thats what
6 comments:
Nice one dude ;)
I liked the part of torturing a prisoner by making him see Dravid's 96-ball 12 runs. I think Dravid might have been to afraid to enforce follow-on based on the history of Indian cricket; which brings out a point: Is Attitude better than History? I guess in some cases, yes it is. And we missed out the third test victory dearly! Like Mandar commented another thing: "Indian Cricketers can never win in Style". ..
Regarding the 24th Aug One-day match, I agree that Dravid did a great job of scoring that extra 9 runs! Otherwise India would have definitely snatched defeat from jaws of victory.
@GKS
Thanks for the apt comments, Yea some times History is more imp than than Attitude i guess. People will remember 1-0 victory than the 96 ball 12 in the long run.
You may like to read Dravid's comments after the match. He told even i would have opted for "follow on " if i was sitting in easy chair. I feel after few years you will know the importance of his decision.
Dravid plays for the team and not for his building personal image. I know his innings 12(96) wasn't that great but he put effort in the right direction which is more important. Watching the TV or seeing the score card will lead to make easy comments which we Indians are pretty good at!
@pratapa
I completely agree with you, thats y he makes a good captain, He know his team well,
But still figuring how scores some more runs in same number of ball would do INDIA harm.
Super blog abt the Indian team especially abt Sri Sri Sri and Munaf
Once, every player was asked abt his tormentors. Bowlers mentioned Lara and batsmen, McGrath etc.
Dravid mentioned that he fears his players the most.
Dravid surely is a split personality but, because of his team. Imagine his personal life?
Firstly nice to know that u r email is active and some remembers the password
and some one wrote the comments, IFF it was you I am really happy that u r alive.
Thanks for the apt comments and appreciation,
IF u find some free time do read my other posts
Post a Comment