Sports Minister M S Gill asks P Gopichand, ‘Who are you?’. Apparently this made a big headline couple of days ago. I would empathize with Mr Gill, as I would have asked the same question hadn't I had the habit of google'ng people’s name. FYI P Gopichand is 2001 All England Badminton Champion only after Prakash Padukone (yes now famous father of Deepika Padukone). He is also the National Badminton Coach, to Saina Nehwal.
Abhinav Bindra, Sushil Kumar and Vijender Kumar have made INDIA proud no doubt, probably would have gone unnoticed, but for their medals. Forget about recognizing them in public how many of us would remember them a month later. How many of us know the rules about shooting or boxing or weight lifting? Sorry to say but unfortunately they are born in the wrong era or wrong country. I only remember Karnam malleswari(weightlifting) and Rajyavardhan Rathore(shooting) during Olympics and hope some day some how, an athletes would do a PT Usha or Mikha Singh act.
Now that's a lot of alien names in country where cricket is religion and sachin is GOD. We have grown on watching kapil, gavaskar, sachin and now dhoni entertaining us to the core. Discussion about cricket and cricketer's name falls in our comfort zone. We would rather talk about dravid's back foot than leander’s back hand. We can talk hours write articles about them for pages about their records, statistics, and their life. We always want to attain kapil's passion, gavaskar's concentration, sachin's application and dhoni's daredevil attitude don’t we? We would criticize ganguly for his fielding never would we appreciate an athlete for his efforts. We would struggle to name 11 all time great non cricketers’s but would pen down the 11 for the next ODI.
Why would ambani, mallya or srk invest in IPL franchise? Why would a Subash Goel create ICL against BCCI? why not other sports? In the current age where ever thing is business, cricket sells and business men are no philanthropists. Cricket generates revenue and hence gets the prime importance be it on TV or Paper.As they say “paisa bolta hai”.
Media also has a lot of effect on our thinking process, they have elated and highlighted cricket to such an extent that it has been inculcated in our blood. In a country where cricket sells, cricketers are projected as macho men; heroines would pose with yuvi or dhoni rather than with paes or gopichand. Even though the later have achieved a lot more than the former.
As Bishen Singh Bedi wrote "We are a confused nation when it comes to sports". I truly agree with him.
Just to conclude read this article.
Can India host olympics ?
6 comments:
there is a big difference .. Cricket is a game and most of the Olympic disciplines are sports.
Generally entertainment quotient will be more for Games ...
What would people like to see on TV? Yuvraj scoring 6 sixes in a over OR Abhinav Bindra shooting a target from 10 metres ?
so I feel there will be more viewers for Games and hence more investment.
Also we have discussed several times ... why so many follow cricket in India ? because only 8-9 nations play cricket at professional level. Chances of India getting to top are very high :) Same cannot said about Football where we are 150+ in FIFA ranking.
Regarding Olympics, we should concentrate more on sports(boxing, shooting) which suits our DNA. The plain truth is that unless some gene mutation happens we won't produce a sprinter like Usain Bolt. I guess many would have observed this ... all 8 finalist in 100 m race were Afros!
Shande, this is not right!!
See China, how much diff would be there between our DNA and their DNA. Even in physique, they are similar to ours.
It is not a question of DNA. But, mental attitude. Yes, there is a lot left to be done in infrastructure etc.
You have to dump these cricketers - they are junk!! Indian cricket can never reach the heights of Australian cricket!! So, even in cricket, we were never No 1 and will never be unless we change our attitude, work ethics etc.
@yashas:
u are right with example of China with respect to attitude ...
But i feel DNA matters. With the kind of investment China should have produced 50 Usain Bolts and 100 Michael Phelps. But have they come close to producing even one of them ? Ultimately physiological limitations matter.
People like Phelps are born once in a century!! Even America cannot produce them frequently!!
Anyway China leads the Olympics medal tally!!
There are Indians who are more able bodied than may Americans.
The Indian commandos are considered one of the best in the world - MARCOS, NSG etc. Where has the physiological barrier come here?
Its all in the mind!!
@yashas:
I took name Michael Phelps just for an example. Having the mindset is not enough. If tomorrow a guy from India emulates mindset of Phelps or some Chinki .. will he be able win a medal ?
It's not only psychology .. physiology matters.
Read the article The DNA of running
It says
- There's no white man in exclusive club(100m dash in less than 10 seconds).
- In 200m, only 37 runners have ever finished below 20 seconds, and 35 of them are black.
- In the middle distance races of 400, 800 and 1,500 metres, you may find a few whites.
- In the long distance endurance races like 5,000 and 10,000 metres, again there are no whites among those holding the top 50 timings.
- In events that involve sheer strength, like shot put, discus, javelin and hammer throw, the situation is exactly the opposite. There is not a single black in the top 50 records in hammer throw and javelin, while there is only one black each in shot put and discus.
Read the article for more facts and let me know your opinion.
dude, your conclusion does not meet the description above.
u have absolutely proved almost, that indian r behind cricket and nothing else, and in the end you are agreeing to bedi that we are confused sporting nation!! rest is OK, but conclusion doesn't make sense
Post a Comment